Week 14 NFL DFS + Fantasy Football Matchups Breakdown Column

Matt Savoca’s Daily Fantasy Football Matchups Column returns for Week 14 of the NFL DFS season. In it, he goes through every single game on the NFL DFS main slate on Sundays for your season-long fantasy football lineups on Yahoo, ESPN and CBS and your NFL DFS picks on DraftKings and FanDuel. We have 13 games on tap for Week 14, so let’s dive into the action.

Week 14 NFL DFS Matchups Breakdown

Daily Fantasy Football Matchups: Early Games

Kansas City Chiefs at Miami Dolphins

Denver Broncos at Carolina Panthers

Arizona Cardinals at New York Giants

Houston Texans at Chicago Bears

Dallas Cowboys at Cincinnati Bengals

Minnesota Vikings at Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Tennessee Titans at Jacksonville Jaguars

Daily Fantasy Football Matchups: Afternoon Games

Indianapolis Colts at Las Vegas Raiders

New York Jets at Seattle Seahawks

New Orleans Saints at Philadelphia Eagles

Washington Football Team at San Francisco 49ers

Atlanta Falcons at Los Angeles Chargers

Green Bay Packers at Detroit Lions


 

Kansas City Chiefs (28) at Miami Dolphins (20.5)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Kansas City Chiefs NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Patrick Mahomes, QB $8100 (#1) / 26 FPts/Gm (#2) 22.8 xFPTs/Gm (#2) / +3 FPvE (#4) -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#12) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#8) 21.5 Fpts (QB5), -4.3 vs. Avg
Travis Kelce, TE $7400 (#1) / 23.5 FPts/Gm (#1) 20.1 xFPTs/Gm (#1) / +3.2 FPvE (#2) +0.2 FPA vs Avg (#18) / +1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#24) 20.5 Fpts (TE1), -2.8 vs. Avg
Tyreek Hill, WR $8500 (#2) / 27.5 FPts/Gm (#2) 22.9 xFPTs/Gm (#2) / +4.6 FPvE (#2) -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -4.1 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 21 Fpts (WR2), -6.5 vs. Avg
Clyde Edwards-Helaire, RB $5900 (#17) / 13 FPts/Gm (#19) 13.9 xFPTs/Gm (#16) / -1 FPvE (#62) +1.2 FPA vs Avg (#21) / -1.5 FPA vs. Avg (#18) 14.5 Fpts (RB16), +1.6 vs. Avg

Miami Dolphins NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Tua Tagovailoa, QB $5400 (#19) / 11 FPts/Gm (#27) 12.7 xFPTs/Gm (#27) / -1.5 FPvE (#26) -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#11) / +0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#16) 11.5 Fpts (QB23), +0.3 vs. Avg
Myles Gaskin, RB $5600 (#21) / 11 FPts/Gm (#27) 14.6 xFPTs/Gm (#13) / -3.5 FPvE (#88) +2 FPA vs Avg (#22) / -0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#20) 16 Fpts (RB11), +4.9 vs. Avg
DeVante Parker, WR $6100 (#20) / 13 FPts/Gm (#38) 12.3 xFPTs/Gm (#39) / +0.6 FPvE (#47) -1 FPA vs Avg (#13) / +1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#24) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), -1.4 vs. Avg
Mike Gesicki, TE $4500 (#5) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#7) 9.7 xFPTs/Gm (#9) / +1 FPvE (#10) +0.6 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +2 FPA vs. Avg (#25) 10 Fpts (TE9), -0.7 vs. Avg
Jakeem Grant, WR $3400 (#67) / 5 FPts/Gm (#91) 5.5 xFPTs/Gm (#92) / -0.6 FPvE (#96) -4.4 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -9 FPA vs. Avg (#1) 4.5 Fpts (WR78), -0.4 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Kansas City Chiefs NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Sammy Watkins, WR 73.5% 14.4% / 13% +3.4 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +6.7 FPA vs. Avg (#27) MME-Only
Le’Veon Bell, RB 32.5% 6.6% / 3.6% +1.2 FPA vs Avg (#21) / -1.5 FPA vs. Avg (#18) MME-Only
Demarcus Robinson, WR 73.0% 11.5% / 11.5% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#8) MME-Only
Mecole Hardman, WR 42.5% 9.4% / 10.4% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#8) MME-Only
Darrel Williams, RB 23.0% 4.8% / 3.4% +1.2 FPA vs Avg (#21) / -1.5 FPA vs. Avg (#18) Look Elsewhere
Deon Yelder, TE 19.0% 4.1% / 2.7% +0.2 FPA vs Avg (#18) / +1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#24) Look Elsewhere

Miami Dolphins NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Lynn Bowden Jr., RB 29.5% 7.7% / 6.6% +2 FPA vs Avg (#22) / -0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere
Durham Smythe, TE 46.5% 6.6% / 5.3% +0.6 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +2 FPA vs. Avg (#25) Look Elsewhere
Mack Hollins, WR 24.5% 6.2% / 5.2% +1.5 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +2.1 FPA vs. Avg (#23) Look Elsewhere
Salvon Ahmed, RB 62.5% 15% / 8.1% +2 FPA vs Avg (#22) / -0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere
Antonio Callaway, WR 16.5% 4.8% / 4% +1.5 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +2.1 FPA vs. Avg (#23) Look Elsewhere
Adam Shaheen, TE 33.0% 5.8% / 5.2% +0.6 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +2 FPA vs. Avg (#25) Look Elsewhere
Patrick Laird, RB 17.0% 6.4% / 4.9% +2 FPA vs Avg (#22) / -0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Chiefs 27, Dolphins 17.

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Arizona Cardinals (23.75) at New York Giants (21.25)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Arizona Cardinals NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Kyler Murray, QB $7200 (#5) / 27 FPts/Gm (#1) 22.2 xFPTs/Gm (#4) / +4.8 FPvE (#1) -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#17) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#18) 22 Fpts (QB3), -5 vs. Avg
DeAndre Hopkins, WR $7600 (#5) / 20 FPts/Gm (#7) 18.1 xFPTs/Gm (#6) / +1.7 FPvE (#24) -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#11) / +0.1 FPA vs. Avg (#18) 17.5 Fpts (WR10), -2.3 vs. Avg
Chase Edmonds, RB $4600 (#39) / 12 FPts/Gm (#26) 11.3 xFPTs/Gm (#28) / +0.6 FPvE (#19) +2.2 FPA vs Avg (#23) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 12.5 Fpts (RB23), +0.6 vs. Avg
Kenyan Drake, RB $5500 (#22) / 12.5 FPts/Gm (#22) 13.7 xFPTs/Gm (#18) / -1.3 FPvE (#70) +2.2 FPA vs Avg (#23) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 15 Fpts (RB13), +2.6 vs. Avg
Christian Kirk, WR $4700 (#40) / 12 FPts/Gm (#40) 11 xFPTs/Gm (#45) / +1.2 FPvE (#29) +1.7 FPA vs Avg (#21) / +2.8 FPA vs. Avg (#23) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), -0.7 vs. Avg

New York Giants NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Daniel Jones, QB $5500 (#17) / 15 FPts/Gm (#22) 16.1 xFPTs/Gm (#21) / -1.3 FPvE (#23) +1.5 FPA vs Avg (#24) / -0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#12) 17.5 Fpts (QB12), +2.7 vs. Avg
Sterling Shepard, WR $5200 (#29) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#52) 11.1 xFPTs/Gm (#44) / -0.8 FPvE (#102) +0.8 FPA vs Avg (#22) / -2 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), +1.2 vs. Avg
Wayne Gallman Jr., RB $5700 (#20) / 11 FPts/Gm (#28) 10 xFPTs/Gm (#34) / +0.8 FPvE (#16) -1.1 FPA vs Avg (#14) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) 9.5 Fpts (RB28), -1.3 vs. Avg
Darius Slayton, WR $4200 (#48) / 9 FPts/Gm (#57) 9.7 xFPTs/Gm (#53) / -0.6 FPvE (#96) +3.4 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +10.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) 11 Fpts (WR39), +1.9 vs. Avg
Evan Engram, TE $4300 (#7) / 8 FPts/Gm (#20) 9.4 xFPTs/Gm (#13) / -1.6 FPvE (#65) -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#12) / -2.5 FPA vs. Avg (#8) 9 Fpts (TE12), +1.2 vs. Avg
Golden Tate, WR $3600 (#62) / 8 FPts/Gm (#67) 7.8 xFPTs/Gm (#75) / +0.3 FPvE (#58) -1 FPA vs Avg (#11) / +2 FPA vs. Avg (#22) 7.5 Fpts (WR61), -0.6 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Arizona Cardinals NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Andy Isabella, WR 41.0% 9.6% / 10.5% -2.1 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#9) MME-Only
Larry Fitzgerald, WR 78.0% 18.6% / 17.2% -2.1 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#9) MME-Only
Dan Arnold, TE 33.0% 8% / 9.2% -2.9 FPA vs Avg (#6) / +0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#19) Look Elsewhere
Maxx Williams, TE 52.5% 6.3% / 5.3% -2.9 FPA vs Avg (#6) / +0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#19) Look Elsewhere
KeeSean Johnson, WR 39.0% 8.2% / 7% -2.1 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#9) Look Elsewhere

New York Giants NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Dion Lewis, RB 23.5% 8.6% / 6.4% -1.1 FPA vs Avg (#14) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) MME-Only
Alfred Morris, RB 20.0% 8.3% / 4.1% -1.1 FPA vs Avg (#14) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) MME-Only
Kaden Smith, TE 57.0% 7% / 5% -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#12) / -2.5 FPA vs. Avg (#8) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Cardinals 24, Giants 21

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Denver Broncos (21.5) at Carolina Panthers (24)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback PlayWeek 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Denver Broncos NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Drew Lock, QB $5100 (#21) / 13.5 FPts/Gm (#24) 17.4 xFPTs/Gm (#18) / -3.9 FPvE (#31) -3 FPA vs Avg (#3) / +1.7 FPA vs. Avg (#25) 14.5 Fpts (QB18), +1 vs. Avg
Tim Patrick, WR $4200 (#48) / 13.5 FPts/Gm (#34) 11.9 xFPTs/Gm (#40) / +1.7 FPvE (#24) +1.3 FPA vs Avg (#25) / -0.1 FPA vs. Avg (#17) 12.5 Fpts (WR28), -1.1 vs. Avg
Jerry Jeudy, WR $4700 (#40) / 6 FPts/Gm (#84) 9.1 xFPTs/Gm (#59) / -3 FPvE (#125) -2.7 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#24) 8 Fpts (WR54), +1.9 vs. Avg
Melvin Gordon III, RB $5200 (#26) / 13 FPts/Gm (#18) 12.8 xFPTs/Gm (#24) / +0.2 FPvE (#31) +3.6 FPA vs Avg (#26) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) 15 Fpts (RB13), +2 vs. Avg
Noah Fant, TE $4100 (#9) / 9.5 FPts/Gm (#8) 9.6 xFPTs/Gm (#11) / +0.1 FPvE (#29) -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 9.5 Fpts (TE10), -0.2 vs. Avg
Phillip Lindsay, RB $4300 (#45) / 5 FPts/Gm (#62) 5.9 xFPTs/Gm (#58) / -1.1 FPvE (#65) +3.6 FPA vs Avg (#26) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) 7.5 Fpts (RB38), +2.7 vs. Avg

Carolina Panthers NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Teddy Bridgewater, QB $5800 (#13) / 18 FPts/Gm (#15) 17.5 xFPTs/Gm (#16) / +0.7 FPvE (#11) -0.6 FPA vs Avg (#15) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#5) 17 Fpts (QB13), -1.2 vs. Avg
Christian McCaffrey, RB $9200 (#2) / 36 FPts/Gm (#1) 30.1 xFPTs/Gm (#1) / +6.1 FPvE (#1) +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +6.8 FPA vs. Avg (#29) 30.5 Fpts (RB1), -5.7 vs. Avg
Robby Anderson, WR $6200 (#19) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#25) 14.9 xFPTs/Gm (#23) / +0.4 FPvE (#54) -1.8 FPA vs Avg (#8) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#13) 14 Fpts (WR22), -1.3 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Denver Broncos NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
K.J. Hamler, WR 16% / 16% -2.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / +0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#18) MME-Only
Nick Vannett, TE 35.5% 6.5% / 5.3% -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#28) Look Elsewhere
Royce Freeman, RB 14.5% 5.9% / 4.3% +3.6 FPA vs Avg (#26) / -4.8 FPA vs. Avg (#6) Look Elsewhere
DaeSean Hamilton, WR 43.5% 9.8% / 9.8% -2.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / +0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#18) Look Elsewhere

Carolina Panthers NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Brandon Zylstra, WR 14.5% 5.1% / 4.5% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#7) Look Elsewhere
Mike Davis, RB 64.0% 15.8% / 9.3% +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +6.8 FPA vs. Avg (#29) Look Elsewhere
Ian Thomas, TE 66.5% 6.1% / 5.3% -2.5 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#3) Look Elsewhere
Chris Manhertz, TE 45.0% 5.4% / 4.4% -2.5 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#3) Look Elsewhere
Pharoh Cooper, WR 3.5% 0% / 0% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#7) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Panthers 27, Broncos 20.

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Houston Texans (23.5) at Chicago Bears (22)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Houston Texans NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Deshaun Watson, QB $7600 (#3) / 23.5 FPts/Gm (#6) 21.7 xFPTs/Gm (#5) / +1.8 FPvE (#8) -2.7 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#14) 19 Fpts (QB11), -4.5 vs. Avg
Brandin Cooks, WR $6100 (#20) / 13 FPts/Gm (#37) 12.8 xFPTs/Gm (#35) / +0.2 FPvE (#65) -1.1 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +0.5 FPA vs. Avg (#20) 12.5 Fpts (WR28), -0.5 vs. Avg
Keke Coutee, WR $5000 (#32) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#50) 9.5 xFPTs/Gm (#55) / +0.9 FPvE (#39) -4.8 FPA vs Avg (#2) / -6.3 FPA vs. Avg (#2) 8 Fpts (WR54), -2.4 vs. Avg
David Johnson, RB $5200 (#26) / 10 FPts/Gm (#31) 11.9 xFPTs/Gm (#27) / -1.9 FPvE (#79) -5.6 FPA vs Avg (#2) / -9.3 FPA vs. Avg (#3) 8.5 Fpts (RB33), -1.5 vs. Avg

Chicago Bears NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Mitchell Trubisky, QB $5600 (#16) / 14.5 FPts/Gm (#23) 16.5 xFPTs/Gm (#20) / -1.8 FPvE (#28) +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +2.8 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 17 Fpts (QB13), +2.3 vs. Avg
Allen Robinson, WR $6800 (#12) / 16.5 FPts/Gm (#21) 16.4 xFPTs/Gm (#12) / +0 FPvE (#75) +4.4 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +8.5 FPA vs. Avg (#32) 18.5 Fpts (WR6), +2.1 vs. Avg
David Montgomery, RB $6500 (#10) / 14 FPts/Gm (#15) 14.8 xFPTs/Gm (#12) / -1 FPvE (#62) +6.4 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +6.8 FPA vs. Avg (#29) 19.5 Fpts (RB7), +5.7 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Houston Texans NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Chad Hansen, WR 92.0% 16.1% / 19.3% -3.4 FPA vs Avg (#2) / -2 FPA vs. Avg (#6) Value
Jordan Akins, TE 49.0% 10.5% / 10.6% +1.6 FPA vs Avg (#25) / +2.1 FPA vs. Avg (#26) Value
Duke Johnson, RB 60.5% 12.6% / 9.4% -5.6 FPA vs Avg (#2) / -9.3 FPA vs. Avg (#3) MME-Only
Darren Fells, TE 58.5% 8.2% / 7.1% +1.6 FPA vs Avg (#25) / +2.1 FPA vs. Avg (#26) Look Elsewhere
Pharaoh Brown, TE 35.0% 6.9% / 6.9% +1.6 FPA vs Avg (#25) / +2.1 FPA vs. Avg (#26) Look Elsewhere

Chicago Bears NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Darnell Mooney, WR 82.5% 17% / 20.9% -2.1 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -3.7 FPA vs. Avg (#7) MME-Only
Anthony Miller, WR 66.0% 16.3% / 16.8% +1 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#30) MME-Only
Cole Kmet, TE 52.5% 8.5% / 7.9% +0.1 FPA vs Avg (#16) / +1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#22) Look Elsewhere
Cordarrelle Patterson, RB 19.0% 7.9% / 5.7% +6.4 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +6.8 FPA vs. Avg (#29) MME-Only
Jimmy Graham, TE 59.5% 12.6% / 11.8% +0.1 FPA vs Avg (#16) / +1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#22) MME-Only
Javon Wims, WR 25.5% 5% / 5.4% +1 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#30) Look Elsewhere
Ryan Nall, RB 4.5% 5.8% / 4.3% +6.4 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +6.8 FPA vs. Avg (#29) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Texans 27, Bears 26

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Dallas Cowboys (23.5) at Cincinnati Bengals (20)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play


The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Dallas Cowboys NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Andy Dalton, QB $5500 (#17) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#29) 10.7 xFPTs/Gm (#29) / -0.3 FPvE (#20) +2.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +6.4 FPA vs. Avg (#32) 13 Fpts (QB21), +2.6 vs. Avg
Ezekiel Elliott, RB $6600 (#9) / 14.5 FPts/Gm (#13) 15.9 xFPTs/Gm (#11) / -1.6 FPvE (#73) -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -4.1 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 15 Fpts (RB13), +0.7 vs. Avg
Amari Cooper, WR $6500 (#16) / 18 FPts/Gm (#16) 15.9 xFPTs/Gm (#15) / +2 FPvE (#18) -0.1 FPA vs Avg (#19) / -0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#15) 16 Fpts (WR16), -1.9 vs. Avg
CeeDee Lamb, WR $4800 (#38) / 14 FPts/Gm (#32) 13.1 xFPTs/Gm (#34) / +0.7 FPvE (#44) +5.6 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +8.1 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 15 Fpts (WR19), +1.2 vs. Avg

Cincinnati Bengals NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Brandon Allen, QB $4900 (#26) / 9.5 FPts/Gm (#30) 9.8 xFPTs/Gm (#30) / -0.4 FPvE (#21) +2.1 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#24) 12 Fpts (QB22), +2.6 vs. Avg
Joe Mixon, RB $5900 (#17) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#11) 16.9 xFPTs/Gm (#9) / -1.2 FPvE (#69) -0.4 FPA vs Avg (#15) / -1.7 FPA vs. Avg (#16) 16.5 Fpts (RB10), +0.8 vs. Avg
Tyler Boyd, WR $4900 (#35) / 15 FPts/Gm (#28) 15 xFPTs/Gm (#21) / +0.2 FPvE (#65) +9.2 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +6.5 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 18 Fpts (WR8), +2.8 vs. Avg
Tee Higgins, WR $4800 (#38) / 13.5 FPts/Gm (#34) 13.2 xFPTs/Gm (#32) / +0.4 FPvE (#54) +9.2 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +6.5 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 16.5 Fpts (WR13), +2.9 vs. Avg
A.J. Green, WR $3000 (#80) / 1.5 FPts/Gm (#119) 6.4 xFPTs/Gm (#86) / -4.9 FPvE (#126) -3.7 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 5.5 Fpts (WR74), +4 vs. Avg
Giovani Bernard, RB $5000 (#30) / 8 FPts/Gm (#44) 9.3 xFPTs/Gm (#39) / -1.4 FPvE (#72) -0.4 FPA vs Avg (#15) / -1.7 FPA vs. Avg (#16) 9 Fpts (RB31), +1.1 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Dallas Cowboys NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Tony Pollard, RB 33.0% 5.9% / 4.3% -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -4.1 FPA vs. Avg (#10) MME-Only
Dalton Schultz, TE 88.5% 14.8% / 14.2% +1.4 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +3.3 FPA vs. Avg (#29) Value
Michael Gallup, WR 87.0% 19.1% / 21.1% +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Value
Noah Brown, WR 20.0% 5.7% / 5.8% +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Look Elsewhere
Cedrick Wilson, WR 7% / 7.5% +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Look Elsewhere

Cincinnati Bengals NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Drew Sample, TE 82.5% 10.3% / 8.8% +1.2 FPA vs Avg (#23) / -2.5 FPA vs. Avg (#8) Look Elsewhere
Alex Erickson, WR 9.5% 5.9% / 4.8% -3.7 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#4) Look Elsewhere
Mike Thomas, WR 24.0% 7.3% / 7.7% -3.7 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#4) Look Elsewhere
Cethan Carter, TE 25.0% 4.6% / 3.4% +1.2 FPA vs Avg (#23) / -2.5 FPA vs. Avg (#8) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Cowboys 27, Bengals 14

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Minnesota Vikings (23) at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (29.5)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Minnesota Vikings NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Kirk Cousins, QB $6200 (#10) / 18.5 FPts/Gm (#12) 15.8 xFPTs/Gm (#22) / +2.9 FPvE (#5) -1.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / +5.1 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 14 Fpts (QB19), -4.7 vs. Avg
Dalvin Cook, RB $9400 (#1) / 29 FPts/Gm (#2) 25 xFPTs/Gm (#2) / +4 FPvE (#3) -5.3 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -8.3 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 21 Fpts (RB6), -8 vs. Avg
Justin Jefferson, WR $7400 (#7) / 22 FPts/Gm (#4) 17.3 xFPTs/Gm (#9) / +4.6 FPvE (#2) -0.6 FPA vs Avg (#17) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#23) 17 Fpts (WR12), -4.9 vs. Avg
Adam Thielen, WR $7000 (#11) / 21 FPts/Gm (#5) 18.4 xFPTs/Gm (#5) / +2.6 FPvE (#10) +1.1 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +5 FPA vs. Avg (#26) 19 Fpts (WR5), -2 vs. Avg
Kyle Rudolph, TE $2900 (#28) / 6 FPts/Gm (#27) 5.6 xFPTs/Gm (#28) / +0.4 FPvE (#17) +0.9 FPA vs Avg (#21) / +4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 6 Fpts (TE25), 0 vs. Avg

Tampa Bay Buccaneers NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Tom Brady, QB $6900 (#6) / 21 FPts/Gm (#9) 21.1 xFPTs/Gm (#6) / -0.2 FPvE (#19) -1 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#13) 20 Fpts (QB7), -0.9 vs. Avg
Chris Godwin, WR $6300 (#18) / 17.5 FPts/Gm (#17) 15.4 xFPTs/Gm (#18) / +2.1 FPvE (#16) +3.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / -0.6 FPA vs. Avg (#15) 16.5 Fpts (WR13), -1 vs. Avg
Ronald Jones, RB $6100 (#15) / 13 FPts/Gm (#17) 13.4 xFPTs/Gm (#20) / -0.3 FPvE (#44) -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#16) / -1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#19) 13 Fpts (RB21), -0.1 vs. Avg
Mike Evans, WR $6600 (#14) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#24) 14.6 xFPTs/Gm (#25) / +0.9 FPvE (#39) -0.6 FPA vs Avg (#13) / +2.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 14.5 Fpts (WR20), -1 vs. Avg
Antonio Brown, WR $5500 (#25) / 6.5 FPts/Gm (#79) 9.2 xFPTs/Gm (#58) / -2.6 FPvE (#122) -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 9 Fpts (WR47), +2.4 vs. Avg
Leonard Fournette, RB $4500 (#40) / 7.5 FPts/Gm (#46) 9 xFPTs/Gm (#41) / -1.6 FPvE (#73) -0.3 FPA vs Avg (#16) / -1.3 FPA vs. Avg (#19) 9 Fpts (RB31), +1.6 vs. Avg
Rob Gronkowski, TE $4800 (#4) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#16) 9.3 xFPTs/Gm (#14) / -0.7 FPvE (#53) -1.9 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 8 Fpts (TE17), -0.6 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Minnesota Vikings NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Irv Smith Jr., TE 61.0% 12.9% / 11.1% +0.9 FPA vs Avg (#21) / +4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#31) MME-Only
Mike Boone, RB 2.0% 7.4% / 4.1% -5.3 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -8.3 FPA vs. Avg (#4) Look Elsewhere
C.J. Ham, RB 42.0% 0% / 0% -5.3 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -8.3 FPA vs. Avg (#4) Look Elsewhere

Tampa Bay Buccaneers NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Cameron Brate, TE 30.0% 7.6% / 7.2% -1.9 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#21) Look Elsewhere
Scotty Miller, WR 37.0% 10% / 12.3% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

 

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Buccaneers 31, Vikings 21

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Tennessee Titans (30.5) at Jacksonville Jaguars (23)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Tennessee Titans NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Ryan Tannehill, QB $6700 (#8) / 20.5 FPts/Gm (#10) 17.1 xFPTs/Gm (#19) / +3.4 FPvE (#3) +2.9 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +2.7 FPA vs. Avg (#27) 20 Fpts (QB7), -0.5 vs. Avg
Derrick Henry, RB $8700 (#3) / 21 FPts/Gm (#6) 19.1 xFPTs/Gm (#5) / +1.7 FPvE (#10) +5 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +3.3 FPA vs. Avg (#25) 23 Fpts (RB3), +2.2 vs. Avg
Corey Davis, WR $5700 (#24) / 19 FPts/Gm (#11) 15.7 xFPTs/Gm (#17) / +3.4 FPvE (#7) +0.3 FPA vs Avg (#21) / +0.5 FPA vs. Avg (#20) 16 Fpts (WR16), -3.1 vs. Avg
A.J. Brown, WR $7300 (#8) / 20.5 FPts/Gm (#6) 16.4 xFPTs/Gm (#12) / +4.2 FPvE (#5) -0.9 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +2.7 FPA vs. Avg (#22) 16 Fpts (WR16), -4.6 vs. Avg
Jonnu Smith, TE $3900 (#12) / 11.5 FPts/Gm (#6) 10.2 xFPTs/Gm (#6) / +1.4 FPvE (#6) +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / -1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#12) 10.5 Fpts (TE7), -1.1 vs. Avg

Jacksonville Jaguars NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Mike Glennon, QB $5100 (#21) / 16 FPts/Gm (#20) 20.1 xFPTs/Gm (#8) / -4.1 FPvE (#32) +1.9 FPA vs Avg (#26) / +1.1 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 22 Fpts (QB3), +6 vs. Avg
James Robinson, RB $7500 (#5) / 20.5 FPts/Gm (#7) 18.7 xFPTs/Gm (#6) / +1.9 FPvE (#8) +4.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +5.4 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 22.5 Fpts (RB4), +1.9 vs. Avg
D.J. Chark Jr., WR $5300 (#28) / 12 FPts/Gm (#41) 12.4 xFPTs/Gm (#37) / -0.5 FPvE (#94) -0.8 FPA vs Avg (#16) / -3.2 FPA vs. Avg (#7) 12 Fpts (WR31), +0.1 vs. Avg
Laviska Shenault, WR $4100 (#50) / 11.5 FPts/Gm (#44) 9.6 xFPTs/Gm (#54) / +1.8 FPvE (#22) +3.5 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#16) 10.5 Fpts (WR41), -0.9 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Tennessee Titans NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Anthony Firkser, TE 41.0% 14.5% / 13.2% +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / -1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#12) MME-Only
Jeremy McNichols, RB 31.0% 6.7% / 4.6% +5 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +3.3 FPA vs. Avg (#25) Look Elsewhere
Kalif Raymond, WR 25.5% 7.6% / 9.1% +2.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#16) Look Elsewhere
Cameron Batson, WR 29.5% 6.7% / 5% +2.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#16) Look Elsewhere
D’Onta Foreman, RB 7.5% 7.5% / 5.2% +5 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +3.3 FPA vs. Avg (#25) Look Elsewhere
MyCole Pruitt, TE 29.0% 6% / 4.9% +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#20) / -1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#12) Look Elsewhere

Jacksonville Jaguars NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Keelan Cole, WR 77.5% 13.2% / 15.1% +1 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +4.2 FPA vs. Avg (#29) MME-Only
Tyler Eifert, TE 50.5% 13% / 12.6% +2.8 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#16) MME-Only
Collin Johnson, WR 31.5% 13.1% / 15% +1 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +4.2 FPA vs. Avg (#29) MME-Only
James O’Shaughnessy, TE 52.5% 8.5% / 8.2% +2.8 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#16) Look Elsewhere
Dare Ogunbowale, RB 11.0% 7.2% / 5.2% +4.3 FPA vs Avg (#28) / +5.4 FPA vs. Avg (#28) Look Elsewhere
Chris Conley, WR 46.5% 11.9% / 11.4% +1 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +4.2 FPA vs. Avg (#29) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Titans 30, Jaguars 17

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Indianapolis Colts (26.5) at Las Vegas Raiders (24)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Indianapolis Colts NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Philip Rivers, QB $5900 (#12) / 16 FPts/Gm (#19) 15.8 xFPTs/Gm (#22) / +0.3 FPvE (#13) -0.8 FPA vs Avg (#14) / +0.2 FPA vs. Avg (#15) 15 Fpts (QB17), -1.1 vs. Avg
Jonathan Taylor, RB $5800 (#19) / 14 FPts/Gm (#14) 13.4 xFPTs/Gm (#20) / +0.7 FPvE (#17) +4.2 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 15.5 Fpts (RB12), +1.4 vs. Avg
T.Y. Hilton, WR $5100 (#31) / 9 FPts/Gm (#62) 9.5 xFPTs/Gm (#55) / -0.6 FPvE (#97) +0.1 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#29) 9.5 Fpts (WR45), +0.6 vs. Avg
Michael Pittman Jr., WR $5000 (#32) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#63) 8.5 xFPTs/Gm (#64) / +0.2 FPvE (#66) -1.1 FPA vs Avg (#11) / -4 FPA vs. Avg (#6) 8 Fpts (WR55), -0.7 vs. Avg
Nyheim Hines, RB $5200 (#26) / 13 FPts/Gm (#20) 12.4 xFPTs/Gm (#26) / +0.4 FPvE (#24) +4.2 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) 14 Fpts (RB17), +1.2 vs. Avg

Las Vegas Raiders NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Derek Carr, QB $6000 (#11) / 18.5 FPts/Gm (#13) 18.5 xFPTs/Gm (#14) / +0.1 FPvE (#16) -2.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 15.5 Fpts (QB16), -3.1 vs. Avg
Darren Waller, TE $6800 (#2) / 16.5 FPts/Gm (#2) 16.1 xFPTs/Gm (#2) / +0.4 FPvE (#17) -3 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 13.5 Fpts (TE3), -3 vs. Avg
Devontae Booker, RB $5300 (#24) / 7 FPts/Gm (#53) 6.2 xFPTs/Gm (#56) / +0.6 FPvE (#19) -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#14) 4 Fpts (RB52), -2.8 vs. Avg
Hunter Renfrow, WR $4000 (#52) / 10 FPts/Gm (#53) 9.1 xFPTs/Gm (#60) / +1.1 FPvE (#37) -2.8 FPA vs Avg (#6) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#11) 8 Fpts (WR55), -2.2 vs. Avg
Nelson Agholor, WR $4700 (#40) / 11.5 FPts/Gm (#42) 10.2 xFPTs/Gm (#48) / +1.5 FPvE (#26) -0.1 FPA vs Avg (#17) / +0 FPA vs. Avg (#14) 10 Fpts (WR44), -1.7 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Indianapolis Colts NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Mo Alie-Cox, TE 54.0% 9.7% / 9% -0.4 FPA vs Avg (#11) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#11) Look Elsewhere
Zach Pascal, WR 72.0% 12.4% / 14% -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#17) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere
Trey Burton, TE 43.0% 11.8% / 11.7% -0.4 FPA vs Avg (#11) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#11) MME-Only
Jordan Wilkins, RB 25.5% 6.2% / 3.7% +4.2 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +0.4 FPA vs. Avg (#21) MME-Only
Marcus Johnson, WR 45.5% 12.3% / 17.2% -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#17) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere
Jack Doyle, TE 48.5% 5.9% / 5.2% -0.4 FPA vs Avg (#11) / -1.6 FPA vs. Avg (#11) Look Elsewhere

Las Vegas Raiders NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Henry Ruggs, WR 70.5% 0% / 0% +0.4 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +3.6 FPA vs. Avg (#28) MME-Only
Jalen Richard, RB 23.0% 6.6% / 3.7% -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#14) MME-Only
Theo Riddick, RB 16.5% 5.4% / 3.5% -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#14) Look Elsewhere
Alec Ingold, RB 22.0% 5.6% / 4.3% -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#14) Look Elsewhere
Bryan Edwards, WR 20.0% 5.6% / 4.7% +0.4 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +3.6 FPA vs. Avg (#28) Look Elsewhere
Jason Witten, TE 40.0% 4.9% / 4% -3 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#10) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Colts 27, Raiders 21

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

New York Jets (16.75) at Seattle Seahawks (30.25)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play


The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

Never Miss An Active/Inactive Ever Again Don't get burned by a player being ruled out last minute, use our New NFL Depth Charts page to see starting lineups and inactive players for every team.  

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

New York Jets NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Sam Darnold, QB $5100 (#21) / 12 FPts/Gm (#26) 14.6 xFPTs/Gm (#25) / -2.5 FPvE (#30) +4.9 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +2.4 FPA vs. Avg (#26) 19.5 Fpts (QB9), +7.4 vs. Avg
Jamison Crowder, WR $5400 (#26) / 17 FPts/Gm (#19) 15 xFPTs/Gm (#21) / +1.8 FPvE (#22) +7 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +1 FPA vs. Avg (#22) 17.5 Fpts (WR10), +0.7 vs. Avg
Ty Johnson, RB $4700 (#38) / 4 FPts/Gm (#70) 4.9 xFPTs/Gm (#65) / -1.1 FPvE (#65) +0.5 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#26) 5 Fpts (RB48), +1.2 vs. Avg
Breshad Perriman, WR $3900 (#54) / 11 FPts/Gm (#45) 9.8 xFPTs/Gm (#52) / +1.2 FPvE (#29) +5.5 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +5.9 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), +0.5 vs. Avg

Seattle Seahawks NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Russell Wilson, QB $7900 (#2) / 25.5 FPts/Gm (#3) 22.8 xFPTs/Gm (#2) / +2.5 FPvE (#6) +1.3 FPA vs Avg (#22) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#29) 24 Fpts (QB2), -1.3 vs. Avg
DK Metcalf, WR $8400 (#3) / 23 FPts/Gm (#3) 19.1 xFPTs/Gm (#3) / +3.9 FPvE (#6) +3.4 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +5.6 FPA vs. Avg (#30) 20.5 Fpts (WR3), -2.5 vs. Avg
Tyler Lockett, WR $7200 (#9) / 18.5 FPts/Gm (#15) 17.3 xFPTs/Gm (#9) / +1.2 FPvE (#29) +3.2 FPA vs Avg (#26) / +8.9 FPA vs. Avg (#30) 18.5 Fpts (WR6), 0 vs. Avg
Chris Carson, RB $6900 (#8) / 20.5 FPts/Gm (#8) 17.4 xFPTs/Gm (#7) / +2.9 FPvE (#5) +2.7 FPA vs Avg (#25) / -2 FPA vs. Avg (#13) 19 Fpts (RB8), -1.3 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

New York Jets NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Josh Adams, RB 17.0% N/A +0.5 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#26) Look Elsewhere
Chris Herndon, TE 65.5% 9.8% / 9.3% -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#9) / -0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#15) Look Elsewhere
Ryan Griffin, TE 46.5% 9.1% / 7.5% -1.2 FPA vs Avg (#9) / -0.3 FPA vs. Avg (#15) Look Elsewhere
Braxton Berrios, WR 31.5% 17.1% / 15.4% +5.5 FPA vs Avg (#31) / +5.9 FPA vs. Avg (#31) Look Elsewhere

Seattle Seahawks NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
David Moore, WR 47.0% 8.8% / 8.1% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / -4 FPA vs. Avg (#3) MME-Only
Jacob Hollister, TE 36.0% 9.9% / 8.6% +1.6 FPA vs Avg (#25) / +4.1 FPA vs. Avg (#30) MME-Only
Carlos Hyde, RB 50.5% 10.8% / 8% +2.7 FPA vs Avg (#25) / -2 FPA vs. Avg (#13) MME-Only
Will Dissly, TE 54.5% 6.7% / 5.9% +1.6 FPA vs Avg (#25) / +4.1 FPA vs. Avg (#30) MME-Only
Freddie Swain, WR 31.5% 5.7% / 6.2% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / -4 FPA vs. Avg (#3) Look Elsewhere
DeeJay Dallas, RB 26.0% 10.7% / 6% +2.7 FPA vs Avg (#25) / -2 FPA vs. Avg (#13) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Seahawks 33, Jets 17

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

New Orleans Saints (26.25) at Philadelphia Eagles (19.25)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

New Orleans Saints NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Taysom Hill, QB $6600 (#9) / 8 FPts/Gm (#31) 8 xFPTs/Gm (#31) / +0.2 FPvE (#14) +1.5 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +1 FPA vs. Avg (#20) 9.5 Fpts (QB25), +1.3 vs. Avg
Michael Thomas, WR $7100 (#10) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#65) 11.3 xFPTs/Gm (#42) / -2.9 FPvE (#124) -5.4 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -5.3 FPA vs. Avg (#2) 8.5 Fpts (WR52), +0.1 vs. Avg
Alvin Kamara, RB $7100 (#6) / 27 FPts/Gm (#3) 23.4 xFPTs/Gm (#3) / +3.5 FPvE (#4) -1.5 FPA vs Avg (#12) / -2.2 FPA vs. Avg (#12) 22.5 Fpts (RB4), -4.4 vs. Avg
Emmanuel Sanders, WR $4300 (#47) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#48) 10.5 xFPTs/Gm (#47) / +0.1 FPvE (#69) -0.5 FPA vs Avg (#14) / -0.8 FPA vs. Avg (#11) 10.5 Fpts (WR41), -0.1 vs. Avg
Latavius Murray, RB $5400 (#23) / 9.5 FPts/Gm (#33) 9.3 xFPTs/Gm (#39) / +0.4 FPvE (#24) -1.5 FPA vs Avg (#12) / -2.2 FPA vs. Avg (#12) 8.5 Fpts (RB33), -1.2 vs. Avg

Philadelphia Eagles NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Jalen Hurts, QB $5100 (#21) / 1.5 FPts/Gm (#32) 1.6 xFPTs/Gm (#32) / +0 FPvE (#17) -1.5 FPA vs Avg (#9) / -6.6 FPA vs. Avg (#3) 0 Fpts (QB26), -1.6 vs. Avg
Miles Sanders, RB $6200 (#13) / 10.5 FPts/Gm (#30) 12.5 xFPTs/Gm (#25) / -2.1 FPvE (#82) -9.2 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -13.1 FPA vs. Avg (#2) 7 Fpts (RB39), -3.4 vs. Avg
Dallas Goedert, TE $4000 (#10) / 13 FPts/Gm (#4) 11.7 xFPTs/Gm (#4) / +1.1 FPvE (#9) -0.6 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -8.5 FPA vs. Avg (#1) 11.5 Fpts (TE4), -1.3 vs. Avg
Jalen Reagor, WR $4400 (#46) / 6 FPts/Gm (#83) 7.6 xFPTs/Gm (#78) / -1.4 FPvE (#108) -3.5 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -1.9 FPA vs. Avg (#11) 6.5 Fpts (WR67), +0.3 vs. Avg
Greg Ward, WR $3100 (#78) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#66) 8.6 xFPTs/Gm (#62) / -0.3 FPvE (#88) +2 FPA vs Avg (#23) / +1.7 FPA vs. Avg (#20) 9 Fpts (WR48), +0.7 vs. Avg
Zach Ertz, TE $3700 (#14) / 2.5 FPts/Gm (#49) 7.6 xFPTs/Gm (#21) / -5 FPvE (#66) -0.6 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -8.5 FPA vs. Avg (#1) 7.5 Fpts (TE19), +4.9 vs. Avg
Travis Fulgham, WR $4900 (#35) / 11.5 FPts/Gm (#43) 11.5 xFPTs/Gm (#41) / +0 FPvE (#75) +0.5 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#25) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), 0 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Never Miss An Active/Inactive Ever Again Don't get burned by a player being ruled out last minute, use our New NFL Depth Charts page to see starting lineups and inactive players for every team.  

New Orleans Saints NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Tre’Quan Smith, WR 65.0% 11.5% / 12.7% +5.7 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +3.2 FPA vs. Avg (#26) MME-Only
Jared Cook, TE 40.0% 11.6% / 13.4% +2.5 FPA vs Avg (#27) / -2.6 FPA vs. Avg (#7) MMe-Only
Adam Trautman, TE 41.0% 7.1% / 5.9% +2.5 FPA vs Avg (#27) / -2.6 FPA vs. Avg (#7) Look Elsewhere
Marquez Callaway, WR 28.5% 15.9% / 16.8% +5.7 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +3.2 FPA vs. Avg (#26) Look Elsewhere
Josh Hill, TE 44.5% 5.1% / 4.1% +2.5 FPA vs Avg (#27) / -2.6 FPA vs. Avg (#7) Look Elsewhere

Philadelphia Eagles NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Boston Scott, RB 45.5% 10.5% / 7.8% -9.2 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -13.1 FPA vs. Avg (#2) MME-Only
Alshon Jeffery, WR 34.5% 6.7% / 6.5% +0.5 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#25) MME-Only
John Hightower, WR 25.5% 7.4% / 10.9% +0.5 FPA vs Avg (#20) / +3.1 FPA vs. Avg (#25) Look Elsewhere
Jordan Howard, RB 26.0% 0% / 0% -9.2 FPA vs Avg (#1) / -13.1 FPA vs. Avg (#2) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Saints 24, Eagles 23

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Washington Football Team (19.25) at San Francisco 49ers (24.25)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Washington Football Team NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Alex Smith, QB $5200 (#20) / 11 FPts/Gm (#28) 12.7 xFPTs/Gm (#27) / -1.8 FPvE (#28) -1.6 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -5 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 11 Fpts (QB24), +0.1 vs. Avg
Terry McLaurin, WR $6700 (#13) / 16 FPts/Gm (#22) 15.8 xFPTs/Gm (#16) / +0.3 FPvE (#59) +1.1 FPA vs Avg (#23) / +2.3 FPA vs. Avg (#27) 16.5 Fpts (WR13), +0.4 vs. Avg
J.D. McKissic, RB $4900 (#32) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#41) 10.5 xFPTs/Gm (#30) / -2.2 FPvE (#84) -4 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#8) 8 Fpts (RB37), -0.3 vs. Avg
Peyton Barber, RB $4400 (#41) / 1.5 FPts/Gm (#79) 3.4 xFPTs/Gm (#73) / -1.8 FPvE (#78) -4 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -4.7 FPA vs. Avg (#8) 2 Fpts (RB63), +0.4 vs. Avg
Logan Thomas, TE $3300 (#20) / 9.5 FPts/Gm (#9) 9.7 xFPTs/Gm (#9) / -0.1 FPvE (#36) -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -5.6 FPA vs. Avg (#5) 6.5 Fpts (TE21), -3.1 vs. Avg

San Francisco 49ers NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Nick Mullens, QB $5100 (#21) / 13 FPts/Gm (#25) 14.6 xFPTs/Gm (#25) / -1.4 FPvE (#25) -0.5 FPA vs Avg (#16) / -3.3 FPA vs. Avg (#7) 14 Fpts (QB19), +0.8 vs. Avg
Deebo Samuel, WR $6400 (#17) / 14 FPts/Gm (#32) 13.3 xFPTs/Gm (#31) / +0.5 FPvE (#50) -1 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -1.1 FPA vs. Avg (#14) 13 Fpts (WR26), -0.8 vs. Avg
Raheem Mostert, RB $6200 (#13) / 17 FPts/Gm (#9) 14.3 xFPTs/Gm (#14) / +2.8 FPvE (#6) -1.7 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#9) 13.5 Fpts (RB20), -3.6 vs. Avg
Brandon Aiyuk, WR $5400 (#26) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#25) 15.1 xFPTs/Gm (#19) / +0.2 FPvE (#66) -3.6 FPA vs Avg (#5) / -5.7 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 14 Fpts (WR22), -1.3 vs. Avg
Jordan Reed, TE $3500 (#18) / 9 FPts/Gm (#12) 8.6 xFPTs/Gm (#16) / +0.5 FPvE (#14) +0.9 FPA vs Avg (#21) / -2.7 FPA vs. Avg (#6) 9.5 Fpts (TE10), +0.4 vs. Avg
Jeff Wilson Jr., RB $4000 (#49) / 12.5 FPts/Gm (#22) 10.3 xFPTs/Gm (#31) / +2.1 FPvE (#7) -1.7 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#9) 10 Fpts (RB26), -2.4 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Never Miss An Active/Inactive Ever Again Don't get burned by a player being ruled out last minute, use our New NFL Depth Charts page to see starting lineups and inactive players for every team.  

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Washington Football Team NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Isaiah Wright, WR 39.0% 9.7% / 8.6% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) Look Elsewhere
Steven Sims Jr., WR 32.0% 9.6% / 9.2% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) Look Elsewhere
Dontrelle Inman, WR 38.0% 9.9% / 10.1% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) Look Elsewhere

San Francisco 49ers NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Kendrick Bourne, WR 59.0% 14% / 14.4% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / +0.5 FPA vs. Avg (#17) MME-Only
Tevin Coleman, RB 7.5% 0% / 0% -1.7 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#9) Look Elsewhere
Jerick McKinnon, RB 37.5% 11.7% / 8.3% -1.7 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#9) MME-Only
Kyle Juszczyk, RB 37.5% 5.7% / 5.2% -1.7 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -4.6 FPA vs. Avg (#9) Look Elsewhere
Ross Dwelley, TE 51.0% 7.5% / 7.8% +0.9 FPA vs Avg (#21) / -2.7 FPA vs. Avg (#6) Look Elsewhere
Richie James, WR 53.5% 16.7% / 20.8% -0.7 FPA vs Avg (#13) / +0.5 FPA vs. Avg (#17) MME-Only

Skill Position Opportunities

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: 49ers 27, Washington 26.

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Atlanta Falcons (26.25) at Los Angeles Chargers (23.75)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Atlanta Falcons NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Matt Ryan, QB $5700 (#14) / 18 FPts/Gm (#17) 19.2 xFPTs/Gm (#12) / -1.3 FPvE (#23) +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#22) 21.5 Fpts (QB5), +3.6 vs. Avg
Julio Jones, WR $6600 (#14) / 18.5 FPts/Gm (#14) 16.2 xFPTs/Gm (#14) / +2.4 FPvE (#13) -4 FPA vs Avg (#2) / -7 FPA vs. Avg (#1) 14.5 Fpts (WR20), -4.1 vs. Avg
Calvin Ridley, WR $7500 (#6) / 18.5 FPts/Gm (#13) 17.5 xFPTs/Gm (#8) / +1.2 FPvE (#29) +0.7 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +0.7 FPA vs. Avg (#17) 18 Fpts (WR8), -0.7 vs. Avg
Todd Gurley II, RB $4800 (#35) / 12 FPts/Gm (#24) 12.9 xFPTs/Gm (#23) / -0.7 FPvE (#53) +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +7.7 FPA vs. Avg (#31) 14 Fpts (RB17), +1.8 vs. Avg

Los Angeles Chargers NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Justin Herbert, QB $6800 (#7) / 22.5 FPts/Gm (#7) 20.9 xFPTs/Gm (#7) / +1.6 FPvE (#9) +7.8 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +4.5 FPA vs. Avg (#30) 28.5 Fpts (QB1), +6 vs. Avg
Austin Ekeler, RB $7000 (#7) / 16 FPts/Gm (#10) 16.2 xFPTs/Gm (#10) / +0 FPvE (#34) -4.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -16.1 FPA vs. Avg (#1) 12.5 Fpts (RB23), -3.7 vs. Avg
Keenan Allen, WR $7700 (#4) / 19.5 FPts/Gm (#8) 18.7 xFPTs/Gm (#4) / +0.8 FPvE (#42) +2.3 FPA vs Avg (#26) / +2.7 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 20 Fpts (WR4), +0.5 vs. Avg
Mike Williams, WR $4700 (#40) / 11 FPts/Gm (#47) 10.7 xFPTs/Gm (#46) / +0.1 FPvE (#69) +3.4 FPA vs Avg (#27) / +8.1 FPA vs. Avg (#28) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), +0.7 vs. Avg
Hunter Henry, TE $4400 (#6) / 8.5 FPts/Gm (#14) 9.8 xFPTs/Gm (#8) / -1.1 FPvE (#60) +6.3 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#23) 15 Fpts (TE2), +6.3 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts.

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Atlanta Falcons NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Russell Gage, WR 70.0% 17.4% / 17.2% -0.9 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#20) MME-Only
Hayden Hurst, TE 72.0% 15.6% / 13.9% +3.1 FPA vs Avg (#29) / +2.6 FPA vs. Avg (#27) MME-Only
Brian Hill, RB 33.0% 6.7% / 4.6% +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +7.7 FPA vs. Avg (#31) Look Elsewhere
Ito Smith, RB 24.0% 7.2% / 5% +2.4 FPA vs Avg (#24) / +7.7 FPA vs. Avg (#31) Look Elsewhere
Brandon Powell, WR 10.0% 5.1% / 3.9% -0.9 FPA vs Avg (#12) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#20) Look Elsewhere

Los Angeles Chargers NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Kalen Ballage, RB 53.5% 15.2% / 9.1% -4.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -16.1 FPA vs. Avg (#1) Look Elsewhere
Jalen Guyton, WR 80.5% 9% / 10.8% +1.4 FPA vs Avg (#26) / +2.4 FPA vs. Avg (#24) MME-Only
Tyron Johnson, WR 15.5% 4.2% / 6.9% +1.4 FPA vs Avg (#26) / +2.4 FPA vs. Avg (#24) Look Elsewhere
Donald Parham Jr., TE 0% / 0% +6.3 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#23) Look Elsewhere
Joshua Kelley, RB 28.0% 8.9% / 5.2% -4.9 FPA vs Avg (#4) / -16.1 FPA vs. Avg (#1) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Chargers 31, Falcons 27

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Green Bay Packers (31.5) at Detroit Lions (23.5)

All Graphs Reflect Last Five Weeks of Data, Click Graphs to Enlarge

Team Passing and Pace

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures each offenses’ aggressiveness in terms of pace and passing. The X-axis is Early-Down Air Yards divided by team game-script adjusted plays per second (using Awesemo’s Game-Adjusted Pace from the Advanced Stats Page). The Y-axis is True Neutral Early Down Pass Rate, a key indicator of a team’s desire to have a pass-oriented game script. The matchup-specific teams’ logos are displayed amongst all other teams, in order to contextualize team pace and passing versus league averages (the dotted lines on the chart).

Quarterback Play

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
The three columns represent my three primary performance indicators for quarterbacks. Furthest left (tDSR) is True Drive Success Rate, a drive-based efficiency metric that measures a quarterback’s ability to turn drives into touchdowns, regressed based on sample size. The middle column, Expected Points Added (EPA), a metric that includes scrambles and designed rushes, is a measure of per-play efficiency. Finally, on the right is per-pass efficiency, Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE) based on the publicly available completion percentage model included in the NFLFastR package.

NFL DFS Core Offenses

Let’s examine the primary skill players from each offense. For each player, their salary is compared to their fantasy points per game in column 2. Column 3 lists each player’s expected fantasy points (an excellent “catch-all” metric to measure usage) and fantasy points scored above or below expectation, a great proxy for efficiency. “DvP” measures the opposing defense’s fantasy points per game allowed above or below opponent averages. Finally, “xPROJ” combines a player’s expected fantasy points with their weekly matchup into one “expected projection” metric, which can be used to determine a player’s floor and ceiling.

Green Bay Packers NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Aaron Rodgers, QB $7500 (#4) / 24 FPts/Gm (#5) 19.6 xFPTs/Gm (#10) / +4.6 FPvE (#2) +0.1 FPA vs Avg (#19) / +1.4 FPA vs. Avg (#22) 19.5 Fpts (QB9), -4.7 vs. Avg
Davante Adams, WR $9300 (#1) / 32.5 FPts/Gm (#1) 26.5 xFPTs/Gm (#1) / +5.9 FPvE (#1) -2.4 FPA vs Avg (#7) / -3.9 FPA vs. Avg (#5) 25 Fpts (WR1), -7.4 vs. Avg
Aaron Jones, RB $7600 (#4) / 21 FPts/Gm (#5) 19.3 xFPTs/Gm (#4) / +1.7 FPvE (#10) +8.4 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +11.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) 25 Fpts (RB2), +4 vs. Avg
Allen Lazard, WR $5000 (#32) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#25) 12.7 xFPTs/Gm (#36) / +2.6 FPvE (#10) -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#16) / +1.2 FPA vs. Avg (#19) 12.5 Fpts (WR28), -2.8 vs. Avg
Jamaal Williams, RB $6000 (#16) / 9.5 FPts/Gm (#35) 10.2 xFPTs/Gm (#32) / -0.7 FPvE (#53) +8.4 FPA vs Avg (#32) / +11.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) 13 Fpts (RB21), +3.5 vs. Avg

Detroit Lions NFL DFS Picks

Player Salary and FPts/Gm Expected FPts & FPts vs. Expected DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) xPROJ
Matthew Stafford, QB $5700 (#14) / 18 FPts/Gm (#18) 18.2 xFPTs/Gm (#15) / -0.4 FPvE (#21) -1.4 FPA vs Avg (#10) / -1.5 FPA vs. Avg (#11) 17 Fpts (QB13), -0.8 vs. Avg
D’Andre Swift, RB $6500 (#10) / 15.5 FPts/Gm (#12) 14.2 xFPTs/Gm (#15) / +1.4 FPvE (#14) +5.1 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#24) 17 Fpts (RB9), +1.4 vs. Avg
Kenny Golladay, WR $6000 (#22) / 14.5 FPts/Gm (#30) 13.2 xFPTs/Gm (#32) / +1.5 FPvE (#26) -0.9 FPA vs Avg (#15) / +1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#26) 13 Fpts (WR26), -1.7 vs. Avg
T.J. Hockenson, TE $5000 (#3) / 12 FPts/Gm (#5) 12 xFPTs/Gm (#3) / -0.1 FPvE (#36) -4.1 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -6.3 FPA vs. Avg (#4) 8.5 Fpts (TE14), -3.4 vs. Avg
Marvin Jones Jr., WR $5800 (#23) / 12.5 FPts/Gm (#39) 12.4 xFPTs/Gm (#37) / -0.1 FPvE (#83) -3.3 FPA vs Avg (#6) / -0.9 FPA vs. Avg (#10) 11.5 Fpts (WR32), -0.8 vs. Avg

Running Back Quality Opportunities

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures Quality Opportunities per Game (Targets or Goalline carries), and its variant, Quality Opportunity Share, which are both key performance indicators for running backs. This metric helps filter so-called “empty touches” from a running back’s workload, and highlights the opportunities that are most likely to be successful for fantasy football. It includes injured players, in order to help contextualize players who might be receiving a smaller or larger workload based on personnel shifts

Auxiliary Offenses

For lesser-utilized offensive players, let’s examine usage based on snap share, quality opportunity share and matchup. For each player, I categorize them as an NFL DFS value, a mass multi-entry option (MME-only) or a player to avoid altogether.

Green Bay Packers NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Robert Tonyan, TE 61.0% 12.5% / 12.3% -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#14) / +5.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Value
Marquez Valdes-Scantling, WR 84.0% 12% / 16.9% +3.1 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +1 FPA vs. Avg (#19) Look Elsewhere
Jace Sternberger, TE 27.0% 6.7% / 5.8% -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#14) / +5.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Look Elsewhere
Equanimeous St. Brown, WR N/A 6.8% / 6.8% +3.1 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +1 FPA vs. Avg (#19) Look Elsewhere
Marcedes Lewis, TE 41.5% 6.9% / 6.3% -0.2 FPA vs Avg (#14) / +5.1 FPA vs. Avg (#32) Look Elsewhere

Detroit Lions NFL DFS Picks

Player Snap Share, Last 5 Weeks True Quality Opp Share/True WOPR Share, Last 5 Weeks DvP (Rk) / DvP, Last 5 (Rk) Outlook: Value, MME-only, Look Elsewhere
Adrian Peterson, RB 28.5% 8.7% / 0% +5.1 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#24) MME-Only
Danny Amendola, WR 50.5% 12.6% / 0% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +0.2 FPA vs. Avg (#15) Look Elsewhere
Kerryon Johnson, RB 35.5% 8.8% / 0% +5.1 FPA vs Avg (#30) / +1.8 FPA vs. Avg (#24) MME-Only
Quintez Cephus, WR 39.5% 6.9% / 0% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +0.2 FPA vs. Avg (#15) MME-Only
Jamal Agnew, WR 27.5% 7.3% / 0% -1.3 FPA vs Avg (#8) / +0.2 FPA vs. Avg (#15) Look Elsewhere
Jesse James, TE 44.0% 5.5% / 0% -4.1 FPA vs Avg (#3) / -6.3 FPA vs. Avg (#4) Look Elsewhere

Skill Position OpportunitiesWeek 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel

The Game Opportunity Chart is a skill position overview for each matchup. Quality Opportunities and Percentage of Team Quality Opportunities (which is an identical metric to Quality Opportunity Share) is included here, but this chart also includes wide receivers and tight ends to further contextualize running back usage. Receiver air conversion ratio (RACR) is a measure of a receiver’s ability to convert targeted air yards thrown beyond the line of scrimmage into receiving yards (a RACR of 1 indicates a player earns 1 receiving yard per every targeted air yard). True Target Share and True Air Yard Share are key opportunity indicators for receivers and tight ends. They are each regressed based on sample size (hence the “true” distinction in the metric’s name). Finally, True Air Yard Share and True Target Share are combined into one variant metric, True Weighted Opportunity Share, which weighs targets more heavily than air yards.

Range of Outcomes Analysis: Receiving Opportunity

Week 14 NFL DFS Picks DraftKings FanDuel
This chart measures the mathematical uncertainty in each player’s true weighted opportunity metric (the metric is explained in the caption of the Game Opportunity Chart above), providing an insight into a player’s range of outcomes related to receiving opportunity. For each player, the team-color dot is the “true” metric, while the red dot indicates the “observed” stat. The bars represent a player’s 95% credible interval, which we can use to measure the uncertainty (both positive and negative) related to their expected workload through the air.

Prediction: Chargers 31, Falcons 27

Looking for more NFL DFS picks and daily fantasy football matchups content? We have loads of articles, data and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.


Follow us on all of our social channels! Check out our Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube for more great Awesemo content.

Looking for more NFL DFS picks content? We have loads of NFL DFS articles, data, DraftKings and FanDuel cheat sheets and more on the Awesemo NFL home page. Just click HERE.

Author
A middling athlete who was offered his first sports analytics position at age 14, I've been working on NFL and fantasy football data science since 2017. With a particular passion for data visualization and dashboard building, I love to make data accessible by using graphs and charts to communicate ideas that are difficult to explain with words alone. You can contact me by e-mailing [email protected].

DFS Winners from the Stokastic Community

Subscribe to the Stokastic newsletter

DFS advice, exciting promos, and the best bets straight to your inbox

Stokastic.com - Daily Fantasy Sports and Sports Betting Data, Tools, & Analytics

Please play responsibly. Only customers 21 and over are permitted to play. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.